Accepted
A top candidate must score at least 70, lead the next alternative by at least 15 points, and have no blocking warning.
Accounting Evidence EnginePrototypeprototype-0.1.0
Entity Linkage Auditor
Try matching company records and review the candidates, scores, and unresolved cases. Your input stays in the browser; licensed records are not exposed.
Evidence chain: source → deterministic baseline → model state → review and release
- AuthoritySourceVerbatim bounded excerpt or public identifier
- ComparatorDeterministic baselineVersioned rule IDs, terms, and exclusions
- InterpretationStructured model outputInactive in this prototype
- ControlReview and releaseStatus, errors, metrics, version
Interactive controls run locally in this browser. If they are unavailable, the static evidence remains available through this page and the public JSON snapshot.
Client-side matching
Company matching
The demonstration uses public company identifiers and synthetic collision records. The browser executes a deterministic function over this fixed candidate set; it makes no request and writes nothing to local or session storage.
Decision
acceptedCurrent result
Accepted Microsoft Corporation: the top candidate scored 100 with a 95-point margin and no blocking warning.
A deterministic 0–100 evidence score used to order candidates; it is not a probability and is not calibrated.
5 candidates generated from the fixed public-safe set.
Name
microsoftDomain
microsoft.comGeography
US-WATicker
MSFTCIK
0000789019Year
2025| Rank | Candidate | Disposition | Normalized name | Total | Name | Domain | Geo | Ticker | CIK | Time | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Microsoft Corporationpublic-msft | Accepted | microsoft | 100 | 25 | 20 | 8 | 20 | 35 | 5 | None |
| 2 | Acme Holdings LLCsynthetic-acme-holdings | Rejected | acme holdings | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | Common-name collision |
| 3 | Acme Labs West, Inc.synthetic-acme-labs-duplicate | Rejected | acme labs west | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | Common-name collision · Duplicate entity key |
| 4 | Acme Labs, Inc.synthetic-acme-labs | Rejected | acme labs | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | Common-name collision · Duplicate entity key |
| 5 | Alphabet Inc.public-googl | Rejected | alphabet | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | None |
#1 Microsoft Corporation — accepted at score 100
Evidence: Exact normalized name or alias agreement; Public domain agreement; Geography agreement; Ticker agreement; CIK agreement; Entity active in observation year
Warnings: None.
Public identifiers: MSFT · 0000789019 · microsoft.com · US-WA
#2 Acme Holdings LLC — rejected at score 5
Evidence: Entity active in observation year
Warnings: Common-name collision
Public identifiers: no ticker · no CIK · acme.example · US-NY
#3 Acme Labs West, Inc. — rejected at score 5
Evidence: Entity active in observation year
Warnings: Common-name collision; Duplicate entity key
Public identifiers: no ticker · no CIK · labs.acme.example · US-CA
#4 Acme Labs, Inc. — rejected at score 5
Evidence: Entity active in observation year
Warnings: Common-name collision; Duplicate entity key
Public identifiers: no ticker · no CIK · labs.acme.example · US-CA
#5 Alphabet Inc. — rejected at score 5
Evidence: Entity active in observation year
Warnings: None.
Public identifiers: GOOGL · 0001652044 · abc.xyz · US-CA
Frozen demonstration benchmark
Demonstration benchmark
Five cases test exact identifiers, aliases, parent/subsidiary risk, and common-name ambiguity. This is a functional regression benchmark, not a production estimate of matching quality.
| Case | Ambiguity class | Expected | Actual | Expected entity | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exact public identifiers | exact-identifiers | accepted | accepted | public-msft | Pass |
| Alias with parent identifiers | alias | accepted | accepted | public-googl | Pass |
| Historical name variation | alias | accepted | accepted | public-wmt | Pass |
| Potential foreign subsidiary | parent-subsidiary | review | review | none | Pass |
| Common-name collision | common-name | unresolved | unresolved | none | Pass |
Decision logic
Acceptance rules
Candidate scores combine normalized-name agreement, public domain, geography, ticker, CIK, and temporal consistency. A decisive top score can still be blocked by an identifier conflict, duplicate entity key, common-name collision, parent/subsidiary warning, or inactive period.
Review or unresolved
Ambiguous relationship evidence is routed to review; weak or common-name evidence remains unresolved. The system does not force a match.
Scope boundary
Evidence inspection, not automated judgment
This prototype does not provide investment recommendations, assurance opinions, causal conclusions, unrestricted prompting, arbitrary URL retrieval, confidential uploads, or user accounts. Missing extracted evidence does not establish that a disclosure is absent.